<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JQuery: The Best Javascript Library?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/</link>
	<description>Dustin Weber's Take On Web Development &#038; Other Random Diversions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dustinweber.com/web-development/javascript/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Recent convert to JQuery (actually lived with my own libraries to deal with cross-browser DOM stuff.)

I had looked at prototype and scriptaculous, but it always seemed like overkill for my hokey lil&#039; local business webpages.

What I needed was easy (and varied) access to the HTTPRequest object, and quick and fast HTML injection. 

And as much as JQ is touted as a UI playground, you can&#039;t beat it&#039;s async request ease of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent convert to JQuery (actually lived with my own libraries to deal with cross-browser DOM stuff.)</p>
<p>I had looked at prototype and scriptaculous, but it always seemed like overkill for my hokey lil&#8217; local business webpages.</p>
<p>What I needed was easy (and varied) access to the HTTPRequest object, and quick and fast HTML injection. </p>
<p>And as much as JQ is touted as a UI playground, you can&#8217;t beat it&#8217;s async request ease of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaziz</title>
		<link>http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dustinweber.com/web-development/javascript/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Well. I have been useing a lot of javascript librarys and have allways fall back on prototype togather with scriptaculus. As the writer says, JQUERY has been really popular and for me it was worth a try. First i was after some examples of visual effects in the documentation. But i got surprised. Nothing worked. No exemple did what it should do. I belive that it was the .ckick function that was corrupted. I dont really know but it felt so. I was just locking 2 sec each on every example so it was a quick diagnisis. But anyway. I have a question, 2 actually. 
1. Does you experience the same thing with the examples?
(i uses Mozilla Firefox 3.6.3)
2. Does the library expertizes in UI or functionallity and AYAX?
Thank you very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I have been useing a lot of javascript librarys and have allways fall back on prototype togather with scriptaculus. As the writer says, JQUERY has been really popular and for me it was worth a try. First i was after some examples of visual effects in the documentation. But i got surprised. Nothing worked. No exemple did what it should do. I belive that it was the .ckick function that was corrupted. I dont really know but it felt so. I was just locking 2 sec each on every example so it was a quick diagnisis. But anyway. I have a question, 2 actually.<br />
1. Does you experience the same thing with the examples?<br />
(i uses Mozilla Firefox 3.6.3)<br />
2. Does the library expertizes in UI or functionallity and AYAX?<br />
Thank you very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emad Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Emad Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dustinweber.com/web-development/javascript/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>I love jQuery, it is my favorite but read my post at http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/08/10/the-best-javascript-library/ for a surprising conculsion.  Well, at least it surprised me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love jQuery, it is my favorite but read my post at <a href="http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/08/10/the-best-javascript-library/" rel="nofollow">http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/08/10/the-best-javascript-library/</a> for a surprising conculsion.  Well, at least it surprised me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz L</title>
		<link>http://www.dustinweber.com/web-development/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dustinweber.com/web-development/javascript/jquery-the-best-javascript-library/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Yep,

jQuery is the favorite of a lot of developers who are fed up with the bulk of Prototype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep,</p>
<p>jQuery is the favorite of a lot of developers who are fed up with the bulk of Prototype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
